Showing posts with label Dinkytown USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dinkytown USA. Show all posts

23.12.11

The United Kingdom of David

The United Kingdom of David

The Israelites of all the people of the Near East are the most familiar to our Judeo-Christian culture because of their role in Bible history. Islam’s roots are also in that same tradition.

Ancestral patriarchs and their descendant nomadic clans entered Canaan where they made a covenant with Yahweh who promised them this land. Then they moved to Egypt and were enslaved. They fled under Moses leadership and reentered Canaan. God revealed his law at Sinai and renewed the covenant which called for exclusive worship.

They took roots in the “promised land” and they requested of the priest prophet Samuel, ‘that we have a king as other nations have” (1 Samuel 8:5). A short time before this the Philistines who it is believed came from the Aegean Isles, settled on the south coast and became a military threat to the Israelite settlements.

The two books of Samuel deal with a period when prophetism and kingship first enter Israelite history. This history is formed from two different sources, one early which was in favor of having a king (1 Samuel 9:1-10, 16; 11:13-14), one later (post exilic) that disapproved (1 Samuel 8:1-22; 10:17-27, 12:15).

1 Samuel opens with a sketch of Samuel’s background and his dramatic call to be priest and prophet (ch. 3). There is also a history of the ark at Shiloh until it is installed in Jerusalem by David (1 Samuel 4:1-7:1).

Saul, the First King

At the end of the eleventh century BCE, Israel turned to a war lord named Saul of the tribe of Benjamin who became their first king. “He was handsome, stood head and shoulders above the people” (1 Samuel 9:2). During his troubled reign the Philistines and other incursors were held in check.

The historian presents a negative picture of Saul who displeases God in the early source by offering sacrifice prior to battle, which was the duty of Samuel the priest and prophet (1 Samuel 13:10-14). The later source attributes Saul’s falling out with God because in winning a battle with Amalek, he spared the king and everything that had value, contrary to God’s command (1 Samuel 15:8-11). Saul was never successful in uniting all the diverse tribes into one federation.

The Rise of David

The last part of 1 Samuel portrays Saul’s decline and how David’s influence grows. While tending his father Jesse’s flocks, he is secretly anointed king to be by 1 Samuel (17:15). There are two different sources that tell of David’s entrance into the court of Saul. In the early one Saul suffers a depression that only music could soothe. David, a harpist, becomes the court musician (16:14-18).

The other, a later source, shows how his defeat of Goliath (17) and other military successes increased his fame. “Saul laid claim to David that day and would not let him return to his father’s house” (18:2). David married Saul’s daughter, Michal, which also gave him claim to the throne (18:20-29).

The bards proclaim David’s greatness: “Saul has slain his thousands and David his ten thousands” (18:7). Saul in his jealousy attempts to kill David several times, who is finally forced to flee with a number of his followers. He becomes a fugitive leader. The historian makes it clear that David could have killed Saul on several occasions but did not because “he refused to lay a hand on God’s anointed” (24:7).  Saul and three of his sons, including Jonathan, die in battle with the Philistines.

David Is Crowned King

While David was a fugitive Saul gave his daughter, Michal, who was David’s wife, to Paltiel. During that time David added Abigail and Ahinoam to his harem (25).  “There followed a long war between the house of Saul and that of David in which Saul grew weaker” (2 Samuel 3:1). David demanded the return of his wife Michal, which would be his only claim to the throne.

2 Samuel presents the history of David’s reign which was for 7 1/2 years over Judah at Hebron, and then he ruled over Israel at Jerusalem (1000-962 BCE). The first eight chapters show how he consolidated his power. 2 Samuel 9 to 1 Kings 2 presents the famous court history of David which has been called the prose masterpiece of the Old Testament.

David subdued the Philistines and extended the kingdom from “the river of Egypt to the Euphrates” (Genesis 15:18). His next tactical move was the capture of Jerusalem from the Jebusites which then was called the city of David. He moved the ark of the covenant into the city where it was enshrined in a tent. This way Jerusalem would acquire a religious as well as a political and military significance.

David wanted to build a temple for the ark. However, Nathan the prophet said: “The Lord revealed that your son shall build a house and I will make his kingdom firm. Your house and your kingdom shall endure forever” (2 Samuel 7:12, 16).  This promise is celebrated by the Psalmist and the prophets. David is seen by later generations as the ideal king, God’s anointed.

The Human Side of David

David was no plaster saint! The Bible portrays him as an opportunist who used any available method to gain power. His ruthlessness was depicted in how he arranged the death of Uriah in battle so that he could add Bathsheba, Uriah’s wife, to his harem (2 Samuel 11).

After this adulterous relationship ending in murder, David is confronted by Nathan.  “The Lord says the sword shall never depart from your house because you have despised me in taking the wife of Uriah to be your wife… I will bring evil upon you out of your own house” (2 Samuel 12:10-11). David acknowledged his guilt. “I have sinned against the Lord.” Nathan replied “the Lord has forgiven your sin. You shall not die.”

As Nathan promised, David’s house was a victim of evil. His son Amnon rapes a half -sister, Tamar, and in turn Tamar’s brother Absalom slays Amnon. Later Absalom, David’s favorite son, tries to seize the throne from his father and is forced to flee. He is pursued by Joab, David’s loyal general, who thrusts three darts into the fugitive’s hart. David, when told cries out, “Absalom, my son, Absalom, would I have died instead of you” (18:33). David, enfeebled by age, has another son, Adonijah, who attempted to take the throne and Nathan along with Zadok, the priest, intervened in behalf of Solomon, Bathsheba’s son, who had been chosen by David. 

We do not know the identity of this historian other than he had intimate knowledge of the family scandals in David’s court. His narrative makes it clear that sin brings suffering even for the high and mighty. Beyond this, although David was forgiven, he still had to pay. This dramatic history using the words, thoughts, and deeds of real human beings, is presented as a morality lesson for all generations. It was not erased by 1 Chronicles written later that portrays David as virtually sinless.

"The United Kingdom of David" is one of the pamphlets on the biblical foundations of the Catholic Church written May 2008 to Nov 2010 by Deacon Paul Carlson of Minneapolis, Minnesota's St Lawrence Catholic Church / Newman Center, a Paulist Foundation. (St Lawrence is the Catholic Church of Southeast Minneapolis and is right in the heart of "Dinkytown USA".)

This blog post is a memorial serialization of those pamphlets written by Deacon Paul Carlson at the request of than Pastor/Director Fr John J. Behnke, who asked Deacon Paul to write brief answers to questions University students often encountered as Catholics.

At couple of weeks before Deacon Paul's death, he said: "If there are any financial gains made from the blog serialization of my pamphlets, please have the money given to St. Lawrence Parish and Newman Center or Paulist Fathers, because what they do is so important." If you can, send memorials to St. Lawrence Parish and Newman Center or Paulist Fathers at 1203 Fifth Street, S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55414. 

Remember Deacon Paul Carlson in your prayers, as well as all the other souls of the faithful departed, who have died in the grace of Jesus Christ.

19.12.11

Daniel, Revelation and the Rapture Myth


Daniel, Revelation and the Rapture Myth

The books of Daniel and Revelation are of the apocalyptic genre, a unique literary form peculiar to the age in which they were written. Often described as crisis literature, they clearly were spawned during times of great stress in history when the only solution seemed to call for God’s intervention in the affairs of humankind.

The First Apocalyptic Prophet

The fall of the monarchy, the capture of Jerusalem and the destruction of the temple (586 BCE) led Ezekiel into the apocalyptic because of despair of salvation within history. His anticipation of a new Israel (38-39), the use of four living creatures, eating scrolls (1-3), the harlot (16), dry bones (37), measuring the temple (40-43) and other strange imagery became a precedent for later apocalyptic writings.

After the exile to Babylon and their return home the Israelites were relatively free to practice their Judaism under the rule of the Persian and Ptolmaic empires, but under the Seleucid ruler, Antiochus IV, Epiphanes (a program to Hellenize them) was instituted. Their religion was banned resulting in a violent persecution that is recorded in I and II Maccabees (not found in the Protestant bibles).

At this time Daniel was written (167 BCE). The four beasts (chapter 7) stand for the pagan empires of Babylon, the Medes, the Persian, and the Greeks which also was represented in the four metals of the statue in chapter 2. The tenth horn (7:8) stood for Antiochus IV, their oppressor. There are cryptic numerals used which later apocalyptic speculators worked into their scheme of the end time.

First Century Apocalypticism

The Church emerged in the midst of an apocalyptic boom with the hope for a Messiah. In the first century there were many Jewish non-canonical books written in that genre read by both Christians and Jews. The Dead Sea scrolls contained their end of the world scenario. The Gospels and letters clearly reveal a Messianic expectation (Parousia). Mark 13 (parallels Matthew 24 and Luke 21) has been called the little apocalypse and the sayings are attributed to Jesus. Many scholars believe that it was circulated as a separate tract and the evangelist added it to his Gospel reworking it into its present form, then attributing it to Jesus. Paul reveals his anticipation of the parousia (1 Thessalonians 1:10).

Revelation was written shortly after the brutal Neronian persecution (90s). It presents in cryptic words a partial history of those terrible times. Nero was the Antichrist, 666 (13:18). It promised the parousia was at hand! It did not occur. From then on the Church was content to accept Jesus’ spiritual presence (realized eschatology).

Reformers and the Bible!

During the Reformation open season was declared on the Bible. All restrictions and guidelines of the Catholic Church were removed. The book they claimed to revere was torn to bits to legitimize their individual theologies. They eliminated seven Old Testament books, and additions to Esther and Daniel (cf. Why Are Catholic Bibles Different?). Over the years there were many false prophets with their scenarios of the end-time.

In the United States a Baptist layman, William Miller, using Daniel and Revelation,  set the date for March 31, 1843. He was wrong! He then placed all bets on October 22, 1844. You know the answer! The Seventh Day Adventists grew from this.  Joseph Smith said that the Latter Day Saints (Mormons) would reign with Christ a thousand years on earth. The Russellites (Jehovah’s Witnesses) expected the end in 1918 and again in 1975. The Assemblies of God, in their Pentecostal Evangel (November 28, 1925), expected the rapture in 1934 and again in the 80s. The Southern Baptists and some Evangelical Churches teach this false doctrine today.

The Invention of the Rapture!

A Spanish Jesuit, Lacunas (1816), wrote a book, The Coming of the Messiah, in which he held that those who frequently received communion would be taken up to heaven in a secret event before all others at the end of the world and would escape all the horrors portrayed in Revelation. The Church promptly condemned this teaching as heresy.

However, in England a Protestant sect, the Plymouth Brethren, salvaged it calling it a secret rapture that would happen to all “born again” Christians. John Darby, an ex-Anglican cleric, on several trips to the United States from England in the 1850s, transplanted this heresy in this country. 

He argued that there would be a secret lifting up of the believers to heaven based on  Matthew 24:40-42; 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, thus escaping the calamities of the end.  These misquoted passages refer to the second coming which is in the Bible. The Left Behind books are based on this false doctrine which is rejected by the Church and most mainline Protestant churches. The Lutherans, Presbyterians, and others have condemned these books as teaching contrary to the Bible.

The Living Light, a publication of the U.S. Bishop’s Department of Education, warns that the “popular Left Behind series of books denies a number of Catholic teachings and is both subtly and overtly anti-Catholic. A seven year tribulation between the ‘rapture’ and the return of Christ is not biblical.”

Hal Lindsey in the Late Great Planet Earth predicted the end for the 1980s. Billy Graham said in 1950, “We may have a year or two to work for Christ, and then it will be over.” Jerry Falwell’s Liberty College and the Dallas Theological Seminary spread the rapture myth. Pat Robertson said in June 1982 when Israel invaded Lebanon, that Russia would attack Israel and the world would be in flames. “It’s all in the Bible!” The year 2000 produced the Y2K scare and other doom sayers.

There has also been the lunatic fringe such as David Koresh and the Waco fiasco, Jim Jones and the cyanide cocktail, Heaven’s Gate sect, and other misguided victims.

The antichrist has a leading role and appears only four times in the entire bible and only in the Johanine letters which were written in the midst of a schism (1 John 2:22; 4:3; 2 John 7; 1 John 2:18). This refers to the heretical teachings of his time (past history).

The Roman catechism says these teachings “are the Antichrist’s deception: and rejects all forms of millenarianism (paragraph 676).

"Daniel, Revelation and the Rapture Myth" is one of the pamphlets on the biblical foundations of the Catholic Church written May 2008 to Nov 2010 by Deacon Paul Carlson of Minneapolis, Minnesota's St Lawrence Catholic Church / Newman Center, a Paulist Foundation. (St Lawrence is the Catholic Church of Southeast Minneapolis and is right in the heart of "Dinkytown USA".)



This blog post is a memorial serialization of those pamphlets written by Deacon Paul Carlson at the request of than Pastor/Director Fr John J. Behnke, who asked Deacon Paul to write brief answers to questions University students often encountered as Catholics.



At couple of weeks before Deacon Paul's death, he said: "If there are any financial gains made from the blog serialization of my pamphlets, please have the money given to St. Lawrence Parish and Newman Center or Paulist Fathers, because what they do is so important." If you can, send memorials to St. Lawrence Parish and Newman Center or Paulist Fathers at 1203 Fifth Street, S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55414. 



Remember Deacon Paul Carlson in your prayers, as well as all the other souls of the faithful departed, who have died in the grace of Jesus Christ.

16.11.11

Luke, the Gospel of Social Justice


Luke, the Gospel of Social Justice

The Gospel appears as part one of a two volume work, Luke-Acts, dedicated to  someone named Theophilus (1:3; Acts 1:1). Today they are separated. Critics acclaim the author’s style as one of the best in the New Testament (cf, What Are the Gospels?).

 The author has used a geographical theme to present his portrait of the Risen Christ. It follows Mark’s outline with only one journey to Jerusalem, whereas John’s Gospel has three. The one-journey story has been enhanced and overlaid with many details that reveal a theological intention. Matthew presents the journey in two chapters; Mark in one, whereas Luke devotes some ten chapters to it. Its beginning is marked by a solemn pronouncement: “As the time approached when he was to be taken from this world, he firmly resolved to proceed toward Jerusalem” (9:51). Two additional times the author reminds us of the journey (13:22; 17:11).

The infancy story begins the theme of the journey-to-Jerusalem with the child Jesus taken there twice by his parents (2:22, 42). He makes no mention of Jesus’ ministry in Bethsaida (Mk. 6:45), Tyre and Sidon (Mk. 7:24, 31), and the Decapolis (Mk. 7:31). He omits Caesarea Philippi. Thus Peter’s confession of Jesus as Messiah is not located at any specific site (9:18: cf. Mk. 8:27).

Jesus’ public ministry takes place first in Galilee (4:14-9:50), then at Samaria through Perea (9:51-17:11), and finally Judea-Jerusalem (17:11-21:38).  Arriving he enters triumphantly riding on a colt (19:35-36), Luke is the only synoptic showing him hailed as a king. This fulfills the angel’s words to Mary that her son will sit on David’s throne (1:32). He then shows his authority by cleansing the temple (19:45-48).

Great Omission/Parable Section

His Galilean ministry has what is called the great omission in which Luke eliminates the second Markan loaves story and connected material (feeding 4000). The Samaria and Perea section is made up of mostly “Q” and “L” sources containing the parables of the good Samaritan (10:30-37), the good friend (11:5-8), the rich fool (12:16-21), the watchful servants (12:35-38), the barren fig tree (13:6-9), the closed door (13:24-30), the places of honor (14:8-11), inviting guests (14:12-14), building a tower (14:28-30), planning a war (14:31-32), the lost coin (15:8-10), the prodigal son (15:11-32), the unjust steward (16:1-8), the rich man and Lazarus (16:19-21), the useless servant (17:7-10), the unjust judge (18:1-8), and finally the Pharisee and the Publican (18:9-14). These exclusive parables in Luke’s Gospel gives it a distinctive character.

Guess Who Came to Dinner?

The evangelist showed great interest in many meals that Jesus had and with whom he ate. Levi’s coming out dinner (5:27-39), the penitent woman at Simon the Pharisee’s dinner (7:36-50), the feeding of the multitude (9:10-17), Martha and Mary (10:38-42), a guest at a Pharisee’s home (11:37-54), dinner with another Pharisee (14:1-24), dinner with Zacchaeus, the tax collector (19:1-10), the last supper (22:14-38), and finally the prophetic breaking of the bread at Emmaus (24:13-35).

Jesus, a Prophet of Social Justice
No other New Testament writer except the author of the Epistle of James emphasizes the social justice aspect of Christian living to the depth that Luke does. He preserves the many sayings of Jesus’ warning that those with material possessions have a responsibility to the poor and disadvantaged. He attacks the racism and discrimination against the untouchables that existed. They were the lepers, Samaritans, gentiles, tax collectors, women, and the poor who had no voice.

The theme is established beginning with Mary’s Magnificat: “He has deposed the mighty from their thrones and raised the lowly to high places. The hungry he has given every good thing and the rich he has sent empty away” (1:52).

Only Luke reports what John the Baptizer’s reply was to the crowds who asked what must we do? “He who has two coats let him share with him who has none, and he who has food let him do likewise (3:11). When Levi the tax collector was called to follow Jesus he “left everything behind” (5:28). In Luke’s sermon on the plain a special blessing is given to the poor, the hungry, and those who mourn. In contrast he warns the rich, the well fed, and happy that their day is coming (6:20-26).

He eats with Simon the Pharisee but also permits a woman known as a sinner to wash his feet; then forgives her sins (7:36-50). A group of women including Mary Magdalene served him out of their means (8:1-3). Of all the synoptic Gospels, Luke is the only one who places the Samaritans in a favorable light. The good Samaritan stopped and ministered to a man who had been beaten by robbers; whereas a priest and a Levite passed him by (10:35-37). He cured ten lepers and only one came back to thank him and he was a Samaritan (17:11-19).

Jesus’ last acts before entering Jerusalem were to heal a blind man begging along the roadside in Jericho (18:35-43), and dining with Zacchaeus, the tax collector (19:1-10). These two stories are very symbolic, and summarize all of Jesus’ ministry. He came to bring hope to society’s unfortunate ones. In the case of Zacchaeus, a tax collector and rich, he was able to get through the “eye of a needle” by giving half of his fortune to the poor.

At Emmaus he broke bread with two and “their eyes were opened and they recognized him” (24:13-35).

The Pauline Connection

There has been much speculation about the relationship of Luke to Paul. In Acts 16:9 Paul had a vision of a man from Macedonia inviting him to come and preach.  The next verse uses the inclusive word “we” which indicates that the author joined Paul in his ministry (10), and that he may have been a convert through Paul’s preaching.  Luke is identified as the “beloved physician” (Colossians 4:14). He was with Paul part of the second mission journey.

There is no evidence that Luke read any of Paul’s letters. However, in his account of the last supper instead of following the synoptic Gospels, he uses much the same wording as Paul (Lk. 22:14-20; 1 Cor. 11:23-25). In Acts Paul is completely loyal to the law, doesn’t contrast Christ and the law, and doesn’t preach justification by faith alone. Any discrepancies between Acts and the letters of Paul can be attributed to the short time the two were collaborators early in Paul’s ministry (cf. Who Was St.Paul?).

There also was some attempt to show that Luke the physician used more medical language in his Gospel than did other writers. However this has been rejected by most scholars.

"Luke, the Gospel of Social Justice" is one of the pamphlets on the biblical foundations of the Catholic Church written May 2008 to Nov 2010 by Deacon Paul Carlson of Minneapolis, Minnesota's St Lawrence Catholic Church / Newman Center, a Paulist Foundation. (St Lawrence is the Catholic Church of Southeast Minneapolis and is right in the heart of "Dinkytown USA".)

This blog post is a memorial serialization of those pamphlets written by Deacon Paul Carlson at the request of than Pastor/Director Fr John J. Behnke, who asked Deacon Paul to write brief answers to questions University students often encountered as Catholics.

At couple of weeks before Deacon Paul's death, he said: "If there are any financial gains made from the blog serialization of my pamphlets, please have the money given to St. Lawrence Parish and Newman Center or Paulist Fathers, because what they do is so important." If you can, send memorials to St. Lawrence Parish and Newman Center or Paulist Fathers at 1203 Fifth Street, S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55414. 

Remember Deacon Paul Carlson in your prayers, as well as all the other souls of the faithful departed, who have died in the grace of Jesus Christ.

9.11.11

Prophets, Israel’s Conscience

Prophets, Israel’s Conscience

Prophets were those who spoke for God. They were mediators and interpreters of the divine mind and will. Prophecy was not the forecasting of the future, but rather preaching and teaching to the people, especially during times of apostasy. The term “diviner” is never used in the Bible of an authentic spokesman for God.

“A prophet like me will the LORD raise up …. and I shall put my words into his mouth” (Deuteronomy 18:15, 18). Moses, Aaron, and Miriam were recognized as prophets by later Old Testament writers. Samuel was considered both priest and prophet (I Samuel 3:20). Nathan rebuked David for his adulterous affair with Bathsheba (II Samuel 12:1-25).

The Unwritten Prophets

It was in the ninth century that the prophetic vocation became an inseparable art of Israelite culture. Elijah, whose influence is illustrated in the fact that he is mentioned thirty times in the New Testament (Gk. Elias), was the conscience of the nation and King Ahab of the Northern Kingdom of Israel.  He is also mentioned by the post exilic prophet Malachi as the forerunner of God in the final judgment (Malachi 4:5).

During the prosperous reigns of Omri and Ahab, the poor were victimized by the rich. In addition to the Jezebel, Ahab’s wife, introduced the worship of Baal and Asherah Tyrian gods. A contest was held between Elijah and the false prophets on Mount Carmel with an interesting outcome (I Kings 18). The seizure of Naboth’s vineyard resulted in Elijah’s condemnation of Ahab to death and that “the dogs shall devour Jezebel” (I Kings 21). The Elijah cycle of stories ends with his being taken to heaven in a fiery chariot. He is succeeded by Elisha (II Kings 2-8).

“Classical” Prophets

These books are collections of their preaching and teaching which was edited by others. Amos, Hosea, Micah and Isaiah were eighth century prophets who called for social justice and a return to Yahwism.

Amos and Hosea were the last voices heard in the Northern Kingdom. Israel had been a classless society, but social stratification was increasing. The needy were sold for a pair of shoes (Amos 2:6; 8:6)...and merchants falsified their weights and resented the Sabbath which require them to close their shops (Amos 8:5). Israel was destroyed by the Assyrians in 722 BCE.

Micah, a rural prophet, Isaiah, a royal court prophet in Jerusalem and the rest of the prophets ministered to Judah the Southern Kingdom. Isaiah, the principal prophet of this period, is credited with a book of 66 chapters.  However chapters 40-55 (deuteron) and 56-66 (trito) date from the exile and post exilic times.

First Isaiah (1-40, the greatest of all prophets, preached during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah (abaout 50 years). In the opening chapter he denounces both Israel and Judah for their sinfulness, “Bring no more worthless offerings; your incense is loathsome to me.”

This is followed by his announcing the coming Messianic age. Chapter 6 tells of his call. Next we have the Immanuel prophecies that are quoted in the New Testament (6-12). He addresses the pagan nations with a message of judgment. The section ends with God’s sparing the nation from the Assyrians.

Micah cries out against the social evils of the people and denounced the sinfulness of the leadership.

The Seventh Century Reforms

Judah, what was left of David’s great kingdom, existed as a vassal of the great kingdoms of Assyria and later Babylon. It saw the north destroyed and its leadership exiled. The astral God’s of Assyria were added to temple worship under Manasseh (II Kings 21).

Zephaniah proclaimed the day of Yahweh is near. He warned the people to seek righteousness to avoid the day of wrath. His preaching may have spurred Josiah (640-609) to bring about massive reforms that took place with the finding of the lost book of the law (II Kings 22-23).

Nahum was primarily concerned with Assyria and its impending end. His prophetic role was to anticipate the fall of Nineveh in 612 BCE.

Habakkuk prophesied at a point when Judah was a vassal state to Egypt. However Egypt was defeated and it came under Babylon control. He expresses concern at what appears to him to be God’s lack of control of the evil in the world.

Prophets at the End of Judah

Jeremiah’s ministry began during Josiah’s reform (his call, chapter 1). However it was not long before the nation lapsed into its former sinfulness. In his temple sermon he calls for repentance or the temple would be destroyed (chapter 7). He was barred from the temple, imprisoned, cast in a pit, and suffered much persecution. He prophesied of a new covenant to come (31:31-34). He and his secretary, Baruch, saw the fall of Jerusalem (586) and fled to

Prophets of the Exile

Lamentations by an unknown author meditates on the fall of Jerusalem. Each of the five chapters is a separate poem expressing anguish and grief.

Exzekiel with symbols, allegories, and repetitions is difficult to understand. It has
four main divisions.
     1) the doom of Jerusalem (1-24)
     2) the fate of foreign nations (25-32)
     3) restoration and hope (33-39)
     4) the new temple and the restored community (40-48)
Important highlights: the valley of the dry bones (37:1-14); Gog and Magog oracles (chapters 38-39).

Deutero Isaiah, the book of consolation represents true monotheism by denying the existence of other goods. The four servant poems are very important (42:1-4; 49:1-6; 50:4-9; 52:13-53:12). The fourth poem is read on Good Friday.

Post Exile Prophets

Trito-Isaiah, the last part of the book of that name, is a miscellaneous collection of oracles by different authors. The temple and its sacrificial worship was ordained by God. It stresses the importance of prayer, fasting and the observance of the Sabbath.

Haggai and Zechariah, late sixth century prophets, inspired the temple rebuilding.  Haggai has four oracles. Zechariah presents his preaching (chapter 1-8).

Malachi (Messenger), an anonymous prophet, condemned a lax priesthood, marriages with pagans, and proclaimed the “day of the Lord.”

Obediah, the shortest Old Testament book, is a prophecy against Edom, a neighbor of Judah. Joel was written to bring hope to the people after suffering a disastrous plague of locusts. The legend of Jonah was written after the reforms of Ezra which stressed ethnic isolation. Jonah was sent to preach to the gentiles which he tried to avoid.

Growth of Apocalypticism

Daniel open with the legends of Daniel in the Babylonian court (1-6, followed by the apocalyptic visions (7-12). Deutero-Zec. is an apocalyptic work of the fourth century (9-14). The New Testament Book of Revelation is of this genre. Revelation and Daniel were used in the “Left Behind” series which was condemned by the Catholic
and most mainline churches as heresy.

"Prophets, Israel’s Conscience" is one of the pamphlets on the biblical foundations of the Catholic Church written May 2008 to Nov 2010 by Deacon Paul Carlson of Minneapolis, Minnesota's St Lawrence Catholic Church / Newman Center, a Paulist Foundation. (St Lawrence is the Catholic Church of Southeast Minneapolis and is right in the heart of "Dinkytown USA".)

This blog post is a memorial serialization of those pamphlets written by Deacon Paul Carlson at the request of than Pastor/Director Fr John J. Behnke, who asked Deacon Paul to write brief answers to questions University students often encountered as Catholics.

At couple of weeks before Deacon Paul's death, he said: "If there are any financial gains made from the blog serialization of my pamphlets, please have the money given to St. Lawrence Parish and Newman Center or Paulist Fathers, because what they do is so important." If you can, send memorials to St. Lawrence Parish and Newman Center or Paulist Fathers at 1203 Fifth Street, S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55414. 

Remember Deacon Paul Carlson in your prayers, as well as all the other souls of the faithful departed, who have died in the grace of Jesus Christ.